tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7565541959216358834.post4190593313491891417..comments2024-03-28T00:22:42.625-07:00Comments on Medieval Threads: Lenberg bra!Heidihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07276734851732074959noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7565541959216358834.post-81607878872884653512014-01-21T06:27:36.239-08:002014-01-21T06:27:36.239-08:00I knew about the undergarment find already but you...I knew about the undergarment find already but your last comment made me laugh. That's what I've been saying all along, even before they discovered this! <br />I've come up with some kind of explanation that satisfies me... Most books were illustrated by... monks! There! They new nothing about women. <br />I did come along some illustrations where women wore panties. It's very rare, though.<br /><br />Thank you for your blog. It's a nice discovery. :) Keep it up!Pouickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02103717443038706315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7565541959216358834.post-10170840834396056682012-07-18T13:54:03.889-07:002012-07-18T13:54:03.889-07:00This is great, thanks! I have always found that a...This is great, thanks! I have always found that argument odd--in all times & all places, women had to have worn some kind of undergarment at least one week out of the month. It's nice to see extant examples!<br /><br />(I wonder how much of our confusion about historical women's underwear has to do with the fact that most period illustrations of it occur in an erotic context. It's like saying that all modern women wear crotchless panties and garter belts because that's what you see in porn.)Jessiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17454793498539356139noreply@blogger.com