Finally I am starting to make some progress on the long-stalled Mary of Hungary smock! A big part of my problem has been sourcing materials, namely the silk. Part of the issue was, I think, that I was not 100% happy with the quality of the linen I had for the smock. It was a good handkerchief weight, but very slubby and poor quality (as has been most of what I have gotten from fabric-store.com recently, fine for a smock but not good at all for fine needlework or anything I want to last). A friend placed a large order with Gray Line Linens, and I got some of their handkerchief linen to replace it and Oh My Gawd it is lovely. Perferct for this project and all of my Brigitta coifs where I have been struggling with the uneven quality of threads on the other stuff. I am never going back. Beautiful stuff.
Anyway, having got that out of the way I suddenly found myself motivated to do the sampling with the slik threads I have already got last night and *gasp* threw them in the wash this morning. Putting filament silk in the washer and dryer is about the scariest thing I have ever in my life done, but wouldn't you know it, they came out beautifully! I'm not saying this smock is going to get heavy laundering every single time I wear it, but it's good to know when it get's dirty, and it will, I can clean it! In looking at the sample I much prefer the look of the more delicate Soie de Paris, which is the darker gold color on the top. I think it will fill in the pattern better than the more tightly twisted Soie Gobelin bellow it, even though that was easier to work with and strikes me as more durable. Both retained their sheen beautifully, even though I went on autopilot and put Biz in the wash (not a good idea with silk or wool in the mix) and machine dried it (admittedly on low). Neither color bled in the least. The grey lines you see are my smocking dot marks, I used non-washable marking pen on the sample fabric.
Now all I need to do is cut out the smock and get the pieces finished so I can start the embroidery. I should be able to do that while I wait for the silk to get here. The front, back and sleeves are constructed and finished separately and embroidered before being joined together at the shoulders and underarm seams, which makes a great deal of sense. There is a huge amount of fabric to pleat, so that alone will take some time. I went ahead and got iron-on smocking dots, which I know is a no-period cheat but the smock take just over 6 yards of fabric and I may be insane but marking dots on that much fabric by hand is beyond what even I am willing to do in the name of an authentic experience!
Showing posts with label Mary of Hungary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mary of Hungary. Show all posts
Monday, April 8, 2013
Thursday, August 16, 2012
Mary of Hungary smock progress
Well, saying "progress" might be a bit over-blown but I think I have figured out the stitching on the smock at any rate, which means I will shortly be able to make some real progress on the actual smock.
The original smock has a deep band of embroidered pleats around the neckline, originally worked in silver thread which has now tarnished to black. There are apparently similar bands at the cuffs, though I have thus far been unable to find any pictures of the cuff that might shed more light on the stitching. Initially I had thought this might be some kind of smocking, which would have to be put on a supportive band to maintain the tight gathers seen on the original. In doing more research on this, I now believe that the original was done with pattern darning over pleats. Pattern darning gives a similar look to the stitching on the original (uniform, slightly raised stitching without any obvious diagonal lines) and it does not stretch which means the pleats will remain tight.
After a considerable amount of dickering around with pleats and graph paper, I think I have just about got the neckline design worked out! You can see from the picture that pattern darning is giving nice, neat surface embroidery which still controlling all the pleated in fullness. This will also let me pleat a lot more fabric into a smaller area, which makes sense given the dimensions of the original smock. I've done the partial sample shown (I will finish it to show the full pattern) in black embroidery cotton, but I think it will work well in a metal thread. Unlike true smocking, the thread is only traveling in one direction, which should be less damaging to the metal thread.
The only problem I have at this moment is that my pattern is coming out slightly smaller than the original (6 cm on the the original and I will be lucky to hit 4.5 on mine). I suspect I have based my pattern on a smaller stitch length, so I might be able to enlarge it by working over 3 or 4 threads as a basic unit rather than 2. I am not 100% sure I care about this, once I have a better idea of how the proportions of the whole thing will work on my body I can make up my mind. Now that I have a chart to work from and some idea of how much space each row of pattern covers, enlarging it should not be too difficult.
Actually working the pattern is quite simple and progresses must faster than I thought it would. Even though the lines of stitching have to be placed close together, as long as you are careful with your pleat counting it's not hard to do. Using washable fabric marker to make the dots certainly does help, as you can see from the pictures it gives nice evenly spaced guidelines to keep the embroidery straight. Washable marker is certainly not period, but as pencil does not wash out well and chalk rubs off easily, this is, to my mind at least, an acceptable compromise.
| Close up of original shirt from A Flight of Fancy |
After a considerable amount of dickering around with pleats and graph paper, I think I have just about got the neckline design worked out! You can see from the picture that pattern darning is giving nice, neat surface embroidery which still controlling all the pleated in fullness. This will also let me pleat a lot more fabric into a smaller area, which makes sense given the dimensions of the original smock. I've done the partial sample shown (I will finish it to show the full pattern) in black embroidery cotton, but I think it will work well in a metal thread. Unlike true smocking, the thread is only traveling in one direction, which should be less damaging to the metal thread.
The only problem I have at this moment is that my pattern is coming out slightly smaller than the original (6 cm on the the original and I will be lucky to hit 4.5 on mine). I suspect I have based my pattern on a smaller stitch length, so I might be able to enlarge it by working over 3 or 4 threads as a basic unit rather than 2. I am not 100% sure I care about this, once I have a better idea of how the proportions of the whole thing will work on my body I can make up my mind. Now that I have a chart to work from and some idea of how much space each row of pattern covers, enlarging it should not be too difficult.
![]() |
| Here you can see part of my daring pattern, charted out on the smallest graph paper I could find. |
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
More on Mary
| Unknown painter - Portrait of Kunigunde of Austria, 1485 |
Of course now I wonder if the provenance of the gown is correct. Given that it's a royal gown I would tend to think the history of it is at least somewhat correct and that Mary wore it, but why she would choose to wear something out of date by several decades is an open issue. Marion suggested she may have been wearing one of Mary of Burgundy's gown, or one belonging to her sister in law, for the coronation festivities that occurred in the 1520s. This makes sense and bears a bit more research. I did find a website devoted to Hungarian art, so that should be a bit of a help. There are a few images there that show gowns quite similar to this one. Hopefully I will be able to find some reliable information on coordinating head-wear while I'm poking around.
So now I have a lot to think about, and may have to actually write up documentation on this project. If I find anything interesting I will be sure to post about it. I'm really wishing I spoke about 5 languages this week though, between this project and the Lengberg "bras" (more on that later) I'm running into a lot of translation issues.
Monday, June 18, 2012
Mary of Hungary
I'm in the process of planning my garb for 12th night this year, which is set at the court of Henry VIII early in his reign before he went all nutso and cranky. Straight Tudor has very little appeal to me, and I had run across the Mary of Hungary gown awhile back so this seems like a good excuse to make it. Plus there is smocking! Yay smocking!
Anyway, the dress is supposedly dated to 1520, however the only other artistic representation of this style of gown I've been able to find so far is dated 1490. It does sort of look like a cross between a late 15th century Burgundian gown and an early 16th century gown, so I'm wondering what the correct dating is.
I'm also not sure what the correct supportive undergarment would be for this. My initial thought, given the 1520 dating, is a pair of bodies maybe with an attached petticoat, work under the smocked chemise. Someone else suggested a 15th century style kirtle, and yet another person has suggested that the chemise is actually the body layer and the kirtle would then go over it. Given the limited source material I have on this style, I'm not sure. Wearing a chemise with silver embroidery on it next to the skin seems a little strange to me, as you can't really wash the embroidery. Plus the stove tile that is my only other reference at this point appears to show the chemise without anything over it.
Has anyone seen any other references to this gown that might solve the dating/underwear questions? So far I have the following-
Original article on Cynthia Virtue's site, with the stove tile image
Image gallery on Flight of Fancy
Project Diary/notes from Flight of Fancy - she mentioned two books as additional sources which I do not have access to
Hungarian National Museum description
Frazzeld Frau write-up
Pintrest board by Marion McNealy - the portraits here suggest an earlier dating (1475-90). Marion has also told me that the museum is now dating the fabric to 1475, which given the images we have so far makes more sense.
Anyway, the dress is supposedly dated to 1520, however the only other artistic representation of this style of gown I've been able to find so far is dated 1490. It does sort of look like a cross between a late 15th century Burgundian gown and an early 16th century gown, so I'm wondering what the correct dating is.
I'm also not sure what the correct supportive undergarment would be for this. My initial thought, given the 1520 dating, is a pair of bodies maybe with an attached petticoat, work under the smocked chemise. Someone else suggested a 15th century style kirtle, and yet another person has suggested that the chemise is actually the body layer and the kirtle would then go over it. Given the limited source material I have on this style, I'm not sure. Wearing a chemise with silver embroidery on it next to the skin seems a little strange to me, as you can't really wash the embroidery. Plus the stove tile that is my only other reference at this point appears to show the chemise without anything over it.
Has anyone seen any other references to this gown that might solve the dating/underwear questions? So far I have the following-
Original article on Cynthia Virtue's site, with the stove tile image
Image gallery on Flight of Fancy
Project Diary/notes from Flight of Fancy - she mentioned two books as additional sources which I do not have access to
Hungarian National Museum description
Frazzeld Frau write-up
Pintrest board by Marion McNealy - the portraits here suggest an earlier dating (1475-90). Marion has also told me that the museum is now dating the fabric to 1475, which given the images we have so far makes more sense.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


